Defendant also denied Plaintiff due process and subjected her to uncivil courtroom behavior by an appointed attorney, and not allowing evidence to be entered that would ensure the appropriate administration of justice, and abuse of power by declaring Plaintiff to be “not suitable” to serve as the 1 st in line Executor of the last will and testament because of “family rancor”, and instead indicated that a third party administrator would be assigned which further depletes the estate.Owens, by repeatedly channeling money out of the estate into the coffers of the Court, the State of Texas and the Court Appointed Attorneys. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant actively participated and abetted in the estate trafficking of the Estate of Hattie B. This is a suit for estate trafficking against Judge Michael Newman in his capacity as probate judge.When, as here, a 12(b)(6) motion is used to test the sufficiency of the complaint in a civil rights case, the court will be “especially solicitous of the harms alleged.” Id. Edwards v City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4 th Cir. As with standing, the court will assume all factual allegations are true and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |